concocted by the CIA. Americans have been murdered in Guatemala over rumors about snatching children for organ transplants. Former French cabinet members are facing jail for letting AIDS-contaminated blood be used for hemophiliac transfusions. And so forth and so on and et bloody cetera. We already have a foreign policy that looks like a slow-motion train wreck. Pander to the ambient hysteria with another confected scandal and we can write off the next few years along with the last few.â
âThere must be a much higher premium on imagination at the fudge factory these days than there was before my retirement,â Michaelson said, shaking his head. âBut you can put your fevered mind at ease. Iâm not telling tales to the scribblers, and Iâm not going to.â
âWell, I believe you, of course,â Pilkington said. Coming from Pilkington, this conveyed something between studied agnosticism and utter disbelief.
âGlad to hear it,â Michaelson said.
âI do wish I could come up with some plausible explanation for the journalistic sniffing about thatâs suddenly gotten so hot and heavy in this area. I donât have a very high opinion of the trade myself. Iâve always said that working for a daily newspaper must be like producing pornography without the redeeming element of sexual gratification.â
âI think I have heard you commit that simile before, now that you mention it.â
âBut I assume reporters arenât complete morons and that they have something to go on when they start down a trail.â
âGood luck,â Michaelson said. âI wish I could help you, but I canât.â
âPlease do keep our little talk in mind, then,â Pilkington said. âThey canât go on like this, you know. The White House, I mean. Regardless of how the next election comes out. Sooner or later they simply have to make some real changes, get someone who knows a hawk from a handsaw into the game. It would be a shame for you to deal yourself out just when your cardâs about to turn up.â
This was Michaelsonâs most vulnerable spot. In his early sixties, retired for several years from the foreign service, chaffing under a sinecure at Brookings, passed over a number of times for senior policy-making positions that he coveted, Michaelson made no attempt to conceal either his ambition or his disappointment at its frustration.
âCongratulations on not mixing your metaphors,â he said with cold gentility to Pilkington. âHave a pleasant afternoon.â
He walked out of Pilkingtonâs room morally certain that no reporter in America gave two rips about secret medical treatment given to a rich Arab politician more than a decade ago. Pilkingtonâs real worry was something else related in some conceptual wayâsome covert governmental action with foreign policy implications and involving medical care. How had he put it? âSomething that sounds a lot like this.â
Whatever it was, he thought Michaelson knew something about it. Why did he think that? Because Michaelson had looked rather aggressively into Deborah Moodieâs problem? Maybe. Michaelsonâs real reason for doing that wouldnât make sense to Pilkington, whoâd assume that Michaelson was pursuing some personal agenda. Pilkington wanted Michaelson to earn the bribe (or avoid the threat) implicit in his heavy-handed sermon by telling what he knew. He expected Michaelson to clear himself of suspicion by saying No, silly, those reporters arenât after the Amahdi story, theyâre looking into something else altogether. Now listen carefully .
That much was reasonably clear. Less apparent was why Pilkington had gone out of his way to let Michaelson know that Jeffrey Quentin was here. That Jeffrey Quentin had suddenly acquired a foreign policy title. And that Pilkington didnât like Jeffrey Quentin. That Pilkington wanted Michaelson to