view.
We represent such changes as discoveries of absolutes in order to protect
ourselves from our arbitrary status, and to avoid the implication
that human thinking is a creative process. We deny that disciplines of
mind synthetically create; we insist we are but discovering "nature's
truths." We possess an open-ended potential at considerable variance
with contemporary nihilisms, but we must recognize and accept the dynamic
interplay of representation-response if we are not to be acted on rather
than fully acting.
For instance, years after my little fireburn experience, my world faced
dissolution when two massive "radical surgeries" and other macabre
manipulations on my wife failed to check a malignancy wildly stimulated
by the growth hormones of pregnancy. Finally, having had everything cut
off or out, she offered little for further experimentation. The priests
of the scalpel passed judgment and gave her but a few short weeks to
live. Surely the evidence was in their favor.
Nevertheless, I remembered that strange world in which fire could not
burn, and entered into a crash program to find that crack in the egg that
we might restructure events more in our favor. During five- and six-day
fasts, I subjected her to a total "brainwash" day and night, never letting
her mind alone. Through all her waking hours I read her literature related
to healing, and while she slept I endlessly repeated suggestions of hope
and strength. I had no thought of how the restructuring would take place,
but in a few hours, some three weeks later, she was suddenly healed and
quite well.
We traipsed back to the temple, I with misgivings over such a risk of
the new structure, to have the priests declare us clean. And that we
were duly declared and recorded, with the reaction pattern among the
many doctors of that research center running the gamut. From emotional
talk about miracles, the brass-tack realists soon rebounded with dire
warnings that some fluke had occurred and that we should present ourselves
regularly for constant watches for the "inevitable reoccurrence;" just
the sort of doubt-category I would have avoided at all costs.
True, a year or so later our carefully-balanced private world fell
apart. This began when it became obvious that our last child, born in
the midst of all that carnage, was in serious trouble. When the trouble
proved to be severe cerebral palsy, our bubble burst, the dragon roared
back, and within weeks my world was in ruins.
Nevertheless, by a change of concept concerning possibilities, we beat the
broad way of the statistical world, if only for a while. The social fabric
is sustained by agreement on which phenomena are currently acceptable.
Susanne Langer referred to nature as a language-made affair, subject
to "collapse into chaos" should ideation fail. Threat of this chaos
proves sufficient stimulus to insure a ready granting of validity to
the current ideas. And strangely, even when this ideation decrees that
a particular event must end in death, most people would rather accept
the sentence than risk the chaos.
To be "realistic" is the high mark of intellect, and assures the
strengthening of those acceptances that make up the reality and so
determine what thoughts are "realistic." Our representation-response
interplay is self-verifying, and circular. We are always in the process
of laying our cosmic egg.
The way by which our reality picture is changed provides a clue to the
whole process. A change of concept changes one's reality to some degree,
since concepts direct percepts as much as percepts impinge on concepts.
There are peculiarities and exceptions, such as my no-fireburn venture,
by which our inherited fabric is bypassed temporarily in small private
ways. These are linear thrusts that break through the circles of
acceptancy making up our reality.
Metanoia is the Greek word for conversion: a "fundamental transformation
of mind." It is the process by