Iâm one of this breed too. (A cartoon academic to his wife: âEat your pussy? You forget, Gladys, I have a Ph.D.â) 1
Maybe I yearned to be rescued from my primness, though Flynt was obviously no oneâs idea of a white knight. (Of course, being attracted to what youâre also repelled by is not exactly unknown in human history.) For some reason, I tend to be drawn to excess: to men who laugh too loud and drink too much, who are temperamentally and romantically immoderate, have off-kilter politics and ideas. Aside from that, it also happened that in the period during which my ideas about things were being formed, the bawdy French satirist Rabelais was enjoying an intellectual revival in my sorts of circles, along with the idea of the âcarnivalesqueâ: the realm of subversion and sacrilegeâthe grotesque, the unruly, the profaneâwhere the lower bodily stratum and everything that emerges from it is celebrated for supposedly subverting established pieties and hierarchies.
I was intrigued by these kinds of ideas, despiteâor more likely because ofâmy aforementioned primness. Contemplating where one might locate these carnivalesque impulses in our own time Iâd immediately thought of Hustler , even though back then I had only the vaguest idea what bodily abhorrences awaited me within its shrink-wrapped covers (as if a thin sheet of plastic were sufficient to prevent seepage from the filth within). In fact, the first time I peeled away the protective casing and tried to actually read a copy, I was so disgusted I threw it away, I didnât even want it in the house.
Eventually steeling myself against my umbrage, I mounted another attempt. Hustler âs assaults on taste and decency were indeed echt-Rabelaisian, I quickly saw, as even a partial inventory of its pet subjects will indicate: assholes, monstrous and gigantic sexual organs, body odors, anal sex, farting, and anything that exudes from the bodyâpiss, shit, semen, menstrual bloodâparticularly when it sullies public, iconic, or sanctified places. Not for Hustler the airbrushed professional-class fantasies that fuel the Playboy and Penthouse imaginations. Instead, Hustler âs pictorials featured pregnant women, middle-aged women (denounced by horrified news commentaries as âgeriatric pictorialsâ), hugely fat women, hermaphrodites, amputees, andâin a moment of true frisson for your typical heterosexual maleâa photo spread of a pre-operative transsexual, doubly well endowed. In short, the Hustler body was a gaseous, fluid-emitting, embarrassing body forever defying social mores, and threatening to erupt at any moment. A repeated cartoon motif was someone accidentally defecating in church.
Basically, Hustler âs mission was to exhume and exhibit everything the bourgeois imagination had buried beneath heavy layers of shame, and as someone deeply constrained myself, whose inner life has been shaped by the very same repressions and pretensions Hustler is dedicated to mocking, the depths of its raunchiness often seemed directed at me personally. Reading it I felt implicated and exposed, even though theoretically Iâm against all those repressions too. At least I wanted to be against them.
I immediately embarked on reading as many back issues of the magazine as I could locate. These were generally to be unearthed in the discount bins at the back of neighborhood porn storesâthis was back in the pre-Internet days, when people had to actually leave their homes to procure porn. Hunting down old copies of Hustler became for a while my weekend hobby, the way some people go antiquing or collect Fiesta ware. Poring over my growing bounty of issues, I could see that Hustler was definitely upholding a venerable, centuries-long rabble-rousing tradition of political pornography, though it still completely grossed me out.
I wasnât completely unaware of the irony involved in surveying