literature is when he listens to Tom Clancy audiobooks once a year on holidayânot that thereâs anything wrong with that.
On top of that, I had recently watched a BBC documentary about Ian Hamilton himself, who was a good poet and a great critic, and a mentor to Barnes, Amis, McEwan, and that whole generation of English writers. (There is, by the way, an exceptionally good new BBC cable channel here, BBC4, which shows documentaries of similar merit and obscurity every night of the week.) And Iâd met him a couple of times, and really liked him, not least because he wrote an enthusiastic review of my first book. (Did I mention that he was a great critic?) He died a couple of years ago, and I wish Iâd known him better.
I still wouldnât necessarily have tracked down the Lowell biography, however, if I hadnât spent a weekend near Hay-on-Wye. Hay is a weird town on the border of England and Wales which consists almost entirely of secondhand bookshopsâthere are forty of âem, within a few hundred yards of each otherâand one of which is an immaculately stocked poetry store. Thatâs where I found Hamiltonâs book, as well as the Penguin Modern Poets collection, purchasedbecause Corsoâs lovely âMarriageâ was read at a friendâs wedding recently. I bought the Ern Malley book (for a pound, pure maybe-one-day whimsy, doomed to top-shelf oblivion), and a first edition of Something Happened (because it crops up in Dow Mossmanâs The Stone Reader ), elsewhere in the town. Buying books is what you do in Hay, in the absence of any other options.
Despite all these various auguries, I hadnât necessarily expected to read every word of the Lowell biography, but Hamilton is such a good writer, and Lowellâs life was so tumultuous, that it was gone in a couple of days, like an Elmore Leonard novel. Sometimes, in the hands of the right person, biographies of relatively minor figures (and Lowellâs influence seems to be receding fast) are especially compelling: they seem to have their times and cultural environments written through them like a stick of rock, in a way that sui generis major figures sometimes donât. Lowell, it turns out, is the guy you can see just behind Zeligâs shoulder: he corresponded with Eliot, hung out with Jackie and Bobby K., and traveled around with Eugene McCarthy in â68. He also beat up his own father, had endless strange, possibly sexless extramarital affairs with innumerable young women, and endured terrible periods of psychosis, frequently accompanied by alarming rants about Hitler. In other words, itâs one of those books you thrust on your partner with an incredulous cry of âThis is me! â
And as a bonus, I felt I learned more about the act of creating poetry from this one book than I did in my entire educational career. (A line from a letter Lowell wrote to Randall Jarrell that I shall endeavour to remember: âIn prose you have to be interested in what is being said⦠itâs very exciting for me, like going fishing.â) In the end, the psychotic periods make for a wearying rhythm to the book, and perhaps Hamiltonâs criticism of the poems tends to be a little too astringentâthe Collected Poems runs to twelve hundred pages, but Hamilton seems to argue that we could live without a good eleven hundred and fifty of them. And this is a poet he clearly lovesâ¦
But itâs a great biography, and now I was off on this Hamilton kick. I bought Against Oblivion , his book of little essays about every major twentieth-century poet bar fourâEliot, Auden, Hardy, and Yeatsâabsent because their work is, in the criticâs view, certain to survive; itâs in the bathroom, and Iâve got through half of it. (Shock news: Grown-up critics think e.e. cummings sucks. I honestlydidnât know. I read him at school, put him in the âgoodâ box, and left him there.) I
Michael Boughn Robert Duncan Victor Coleman