a bottle or a jar, for instance, he would keep it for
me to openââYour fingers are strong and canny. Lou-Lou. You have peasant genes,
youâll live a long time.â It fell to me to hire cleaning women, handymen, a lawn
crew, though my father invariably found fault with them.
Tonight my father was wearing not his usual at-home
jeans and shapeless cardigan but neatly pressed trousers, one of his English
âcountry-gentlemanâ shirts, and a green Argyll vest; his cheeks were
smooth-shaven, and his silvery-brown hair, thinning at the crown but abundant
elsewhere, falling to his shoulders, looked as if it had been recently brushed.
Clearly, Roland Marks had not so groomed himself for me.
There was a sound upstairs. A murmurous voice, as
on a cell phone.
âIsâsomeone here? Upstairs?â
My fatherâs study was upstairs, as well as several
bedrooms. My fatherâs study was his particular place of refuge, his sanctuary,
with a wall of windows overlooking the river, a large antique desk, built-in
mahogany bookshelves. It was not often that anyone was invited into my fatherâs
study, even me.
Now a sly expression came into my fatherâs face. I
thought A woman. He has brought a woman here.
Despite his age Roland Marks was a handsome man;
heâd been exceptionally handsome in his youth, with dark dreamy brooding eyes, a
fine-sculpted foxy face and a quick and ingratiating smile. Heâd dazzled many
women in his timeâand many men. Some of this I knew firsthand but much of this I
knew from reading about him.
When you are related to a person of renown you
canât shake off the conviction that others, strangers, know him in ways you will
never know him. Your vision of the man is myopic and naïveâthe long-distance
vision is the more correct one.
âAn academic. A âscholar.â Sheâs come to interview
me. You knowâthe usual.â
Roland Marksâs genial contempt for academics and scholars did
not preclude his being quite friendly with a number of them. Like most writers,
he was flattered by attention; even the kind of attention that embarrassed him,
annoyed or exasperated him. Each academic and scholar whoâd met with Roland Marks, and had written
about him, imagined that he or she was the exception. What a surprise Roland Marks is! Nothing at all like people say but really, really nice  . . . and so funny.
âIs this your newâassistant?â
âWeâve been exploring the possibility.â
This person, whoever she was, was unknown to me. I
had the idea, since Dad hadnât mentioned her until now, that she was relatively
unknown to him, too.
âCome upstairs, Lou-Lou, and meet âCameron.â Weâve
been having a quite intense interview session.â
It wasnât uncommon for people to come to my
fatherâs Nyack house to interview him. But it was somewhat uncommon for one of
these interviewers to stay so late.
Though there was the Paris Review interviewer, a literary journalist, whoâd
interviewed Roland Marks in 1978, in his apartment at the time on the Upper West
Side, whoâd virtually moved in with him and had had to be forcibly evicted after
several weeks.
Dad led me upstairs with unusual vigor.
In his study, a tall skinny blond womanâa quite
young, quite striking blond womanâwas slipping papers into a tote-bag. On the
table before her was a laptop, a small tape recorder, a cell phone, and a can of
Diet Coke.
âCameron? Iâd like you to meet my daughter Lou-Lou
Marks. And Lou-Lou, this is Cameronâfrom . . . â
âCameron Slatsky. From Columbia University.â
With a naïve stiffness the young woman spoke, as if
one had to identify Columbia as a university.
Awkwardly we shook hands. Cameron Slatsky from
Columbia University smiled so glowingly at me, I felt my face shrink like a
prune in too much sunshine.
Of course, Dad had to