hands that seem to be uprooted from earth, sit on the other side of the interviewerâs desk. There is the same patient alertness needed to listen to the tale and, while it is being told, assess where, out of desperation and guile, it is omitting somethingthe emissary thinks might prejudice his case, where it is being exaggerated for sympathy, and where the facts and their truthful interpretation are the strength of the case, something to work on.
Although Mrs Stark is the one who prepares the yearly report for publicationâit has to be both comprehensive and persuasive, because it goes out to existing and prospective donorsâand she sometimes travels abroad as a fund-raiser, she does her share of interviewing and investigation. Nobody can con Mrs Stark, no. To some she seems forbiddingâand what white person, who among all those whites who still have to be approached and convinced before you, a black, can come into what you are now told is your own, is not forbidding, still there, on the other side of the desk, just as before? But although with her discouraging coldness she doesnât patronize these applicants struggling to express themselves in Englishâthe language of the other side of the desksâand although she doesnât try to ingratiate herself chummily, as many whites feel obliged to do, with the blacks among her colleagues, she hasâhow to categorize this?âconnections with some of these colleagues that have come about rather than been sought and even, over the years, with individuals who to others would be scarcely distinguishable from any in the endless trudge of dispossessed in and out of the Foundationâs premises. The young clerk named Oupa will saunter into her office eating from his lunch packet of chips or takeaway of curried chicken, and sit there, sometimes in easy silence while she reads through notes sheâs taken in an interview just concluded, a silence sometimes broken by talk between her bites at an apple and sips of yoghurt. Heâs studying at night for a law degree by correspondence and started off by coming to ask her for an explanation of something he didnât grasp; it was her very reserve itself that in his naivety made him think she would bebetter qualified to give him the right answers than any of the other lawyers on the premises. She was the figure of the schoolmistress missing in his lonely self-education, she was the abstract image of authority that, resented all your life or not, you had to turn to in your powerlessness. Then he began to talk to her about his four years on Robben Island, seventeen to twenty-one. It was everyoneâs prison story, of his kind and generation, but he found himself telling it differently to this white woman, not censored or touched up as he was drawn out to tell it to other whites eager for vicarious experience. He broke off and returned to it on other days, remembering things he had forgotten or not wanted to remember; not only the brutality and heedless insult of walls and warders, but also the distortions in his own behaviour he now looked back on. Sometimes with disbelief, talking to her, sometimes with puzzlement, even shame. There was the comradeship, the real meaning of brother (as he put it). âBut you suddenly hate someone, you can hardly keep your hands off his throatâand itâs over nothing, a piece of string to tie your shoe, one time a fight in the shower about whose turn it was! And the same two people, when we were on hunger strike, weâd do anything for each other ⦠I canât think it was
me
.â
What did she say? He was a gentle person forced, too young, to see another version of himself that it needed only violence against him, degradation in suffering the lack of humanity in others, to bring to life. She didnât console, didnât assure him that that individual, that self, no longer existed. âIt was you.â
He reached for a tissue from the box on