although obviously I didnât tell her why. She cried, and I hated her for it, because she made me feel bad.
I can imagine what sort of person Penny Hardwick became: a nice person. I know that she went to college, did well, and landed a job as a radio producer for the BBC. I would guess that she is bright, and serious-minded, maybe too much so, sometimes, and ambitious, but not in a way that makes you want to vomit; she was a version of all these things when we went out, and at another stage in my life I would have found all these virtues attractive. Then, however, I wasnât interested in qualities, just breasts, and she was therefore no good to me.
I would like to be able to tell you that we had long, interesting conversations, and that we remained firm friends throughout our teenage yearsâshe would have made someone a lovely friendâbut I donât think we ever talked. We went to the pictures, to parties and to discos, and we wrestled. We wrestled in her bedroom, and my bedroom, and her living room, and my living room, and in bedrooms at parties, and in living rooms at parties, and in the summer we wrestled on various plots of grass. We were wrestling over the same old issue. Sometimes I got so bored of trying to touch her breasts that I would try to touch her between her legs, a gesture that had a sort of self-parodying wit about it: it was like trying to borrow a fiver, getting turned down, and asking to borrow fifty quid instead.
These were the questions boys asked other boys at my school (a school that contained only boys): âAre you getting any?â âDoes she let you have any?â âHow much does she let you have?â and so on. Sometimes the questions were derisory, and expected the answer âNoâ: âYouâre not getting anything, are you?â âYou havenât even had a bit of tit, have you?â Girls, meanwhile, had to be content with the passive voice. Penny used the expression âbroken intoâ: âI donât want to be broken into yet,â she would explain patiently and maybe a little sadly (she seemed to understand that one dayâbut not nowâshe would have to give in, and when it happened she wouldnât like it) when she removed my hand from her chest for the one hundred thousandth time. Attack and defense, invasion and repulsionâ¦it was as if breasts were little pieces of property that had been unlawfully annexed by the opposite sexâthey were rightfully ours and we wanted them back.
Luckily, however, there were traitors, fifth columnists, in the opposing camp. Some boys knew of other boys whose girlfriends would âletâ them do anything; sometimes these girls were supposed to have actively assisted in their own molestation. Nobody had ever heard of a girl who had gone as far as undressing, or even removing or loosening undergarments, of course. That would have been taking collaboration too far. As I understood it, these girls had simply positioned themselves in a way that encouraged access. âShe tucks her stomach in and everything,â Clive Stevens remarked approvingly of his brotherâs girlfriend; it took me nearly a year to work out the import of this maneuver. No wonder I still remember the stomach-tuckerâs first name (Judith); thereâs a part of me that still wants to meet her.
Â
Read any womenâs magazine and youâll see the same complaint over and over again: menâthose little boys ten or twenty or thirty years onâare hopeless in bed. They are not interested in âforeplayâ they have no desire to stimulate the erogenous zones of the opposite sex; they are selfish, greedy, clumsy, unsophisticated. These complaints, you canât help feeling, are kind of ironic. Back then, all we wanted was foreplay, and girls werenât interested. They didnât want to be touched, caressed, stimulated, aroused; in fact, they used to thump us if we tried.