said. âSignora, do you remember already giving evidence in court some months⦠or rather, about a year ago?â
The young woman nodded.
âYou must answer yes, for the record.â
âYes.â
âYou do remember. Good. Do you remember what you said on that occasion?â
She sniffed before replying. She seemed very ill at ease. âMore or less, yes.â
âIn any case, you told the truth on that occasion?â
âYes.â
âYour Honour, I have no other questions. We have a full record of the previous hearing.â
âWow, he really exerted himself,â Consuelo whispered in my ear.
âIn that case,â the judge said, âdefence counsel may proceed with their cross-examination.â
Consuelo stood up, adjusted her robe over her shoulders â again giving off that slight scent of amber â and turned to the witness with a smile. Consueloâs smile can be deceptive. She looks good-natured, with a face like a small, friendly rodent in a cartoon. If you look more closely, however, you notice a much less reassuring gleam in her eyes. Consuelo is a good lawyer, someone of almost embarrassing rectitude, but above all sheâs someone you really donât want to quarrel with.
âGood morning, Signora, Iâm Avvocato Favia. Together with Avvocato Guerrieri, I represent Signor Bronzino. I need to ask you a few questions, but Iâll try to be brief. Do you feel up to answering?â
The young woman stared at her with a somewhat dazed expression, then looked around in search of help, as if tryingto make sense of the situation. You donât expect a girl from the Andes to be a criminal lawyer in Bari, so looks of surprise are the norm. Consuelo is used to it, but itâs going to be like that for a while longer.
âSignora, please answer Avvocato Favia,â the judge said in an understanding tone.
âYes, yes, Iâm sorry.â
Consuelo glanced at her notes. She didnât need to, but we all make pointless gestures when we have to start something, or finish it. âCould you tell us when and on what occasion you met the defendant?â
âWe met at a party. I went with a friend of mine.â
âWhen was this party?â
âI donât remember, it was years ago.â
âSo you canât answer?â
âNo, how could I possibly remember?â
âNo problem. After meeting the defendant at that party⦠By the way, whose party was it?â
âI donât know, I told you I went with a friend of mine. She was the one who knew the host.â
âSo you didnât know the host?â
âNo, whatâs so strange about that?â
âNothing. Iâm sorry. What kind of party was it?â
Castroni stood up. âObjection, Your Honour, the witness is being asked to make a value judgement. That makes the question inadmissible, quite apart from the fact that itâs completely irrelevant.â
âAll right, Avvocato,â Basile said, âletâs forget about what kind of party it was, unless thereâs a specific reason to go further into this aspect of the matter. If there is, please tell us.â
âYour Honour, knowing the context in which the defendant and the injured party met may help us to understand the beginning of their relationship. But Iâll drop the question,it isnât essential. So, Signora, after meeting the defendant at this party, did you have occasion to meet him again?â
âYes.â
âJust once, or several times?â
âI think I already said, he sometimes dropped by the officeââ
âYou mean your place of work?â
âYes.â
âDid he ever invite you out? For a coffee, for example, an aperitif, dinner?â
âYes.â
âDid you ever accept any of his invitations, apart from the evening with which this trial is concerned?â
âThat evening I only agreed to go