them. You might not remember, because of its basic improbability, that this cruel process was accomplished to the tune of Rhetoric claiming that it was for the benefit of the said natives. The ability to disguise truth by the processes of Rhetoric is of course one in which our Canopean Historical Psychologists are particularly interested in connection with the Sirian Empire, but I feel that they have overlooked the extremities of this pathological condition as exemplified in the Volyen âEmpire.â At any rate, I am drawing attention to this now because it is of vital importance to what I am finding out as I move (for the most part secretly) about Volyen and its four colonies.
Ormarin has all his life represented âthe underdog,â though this does not mean the miserable semi-slaves but, rather, the less fortunate of the conquering minority. As an intelligent being he is well aware of the anomaly and, to compensate, is capable, at the slightest stimulus, of providing floods of compassionate and sorrowing words describing their condition. This ability to, as it were, mourn verbally is appreciated by his fellow settlers, who demand from him on ceremonial occasions set pieces of grief on behalf of the exploited, beginning with words such as these: âAnd now I want to say that the condition of our fellow beings who are workers like ourselves is always in the forefront of my mind â¦â And so on.
That, then, is the first and worst contradiction in Ormarin.
The next is that, while he represents the worse-off of the settlers, some of whom are indeed deprived, his own way of living can hardly be described as lacking in anything. His tastes are those of the fortunate minority everywhere in the Volyen âEmpireâ; but he has to conceal this. There was a period when he saw this as hypocrisy and went through some uneasy reversals: making a point of living at one time on the basic wage of the poor, at another on his wage as an employed official; at yet another time making speeches saying that although his position necessitated his living better than the average, this was only to demonstrate what was possible for everyone â and so on. But then there entered another factor â you will have guessed what and who â Shammat, the Father of Lies, in the person of Krolgul. Up and down and around the five units of this âEmpireâ went Krolgul, as he still does, at his work of making black white, white black.
He is a personable creature, with all the attractions of a robust and unconscious vitality, and he won Ormarin over by his rumbustious enjoyment in putting in clear and unlikable terms the uneasy compromise of which Ormarinâs life is composed.
âYouâve got to face it,â said he. âIn the times in which we have to live, bad luck for us all, we must go with the tide and adapt ourselves to circumstances.â
He evolved for Ormarin a
persona
that would reassure the people who kept him in power, actually an image of themselves, or of how they like to see themselves. Ormarin was taught to present himself as a solid, reliable, affable man â genially tolerant of his own deficiencies with regard to the fleshpots â though these were not allowed to be visible as more than the merest peccadilloes â humorous, slow-speaking, full of common sense.
In fact, in the case of Ormarin the picture is not wildly inaccurate: Ormarin does possess many of these qualities. But Krolgul has been creating these
personae
by the score,all over the âEmpire,â so that everywhere you go you meet representatives of âthe workersâ or âthe peopleâ who are affable, solid, et cetera, and who all, without exception, smoke a pipe and drink beer and whisky (in moderation, of course), these habits being associated with sound and reliable behaviour.
Ormarin soon stopped pointing out that he loathed pipes and beer, did not care for whisky, and preferred a
W. Michael Gear, Kathleen O’Neal Gear