natural in our position to indulge in imaginings.â But âimaginingsâ does not truly reflect the quality of the Greek. It should be more like âphantasies,â I think. Look here, child ⦠what do you think? Shall I use âphantasiesâ instead?â
âI think âimaginingsâ sounds perfectly clear. But if you are unsatisfied with it, why not try âfanciesâ?â
â Fancies ?â He gazed up at her with a smile she could almost have called affectionate. âThatâs very good ! Very good indeed! Fancies! â He turned back to his paper and scribbled in the word rapidly. Then, as if his daughter were not there, he went right on reading.
Olivia determinedly perched on the desk in front of him. âNow that youâve found your word, Papa, can you not talk to me?â
âYes, of course, my dear,â he said, not looking up. âWhat is it?â
âI was wondering, Papa, if you ⦠that is ⦠er ⦠have you a liking for Strickland?â
âStrickland? Claraâs Strickland?â
âYes, Papa. Claraâs Strickland.â
âWell, of course I like him. Fine fellow, Miles. Very clever on the subject of tariffs and finance.â
Olivia snorted impatiently. âIâm not speaking of his Tory politics, but ofââ
âOf course,â Sir Octavius mused, lifting his head and chewing the tip of his pen thoughtfully, âheâs perhaps not expert in Greek philosophy, but if he gave it some real attention, Iâm sure ⦠but really, Olivia, must you sit just there ? Youâre crushing my papers!â
âSorry, Papa.â She slipped off the desk and straightened the pile of closely written notes. âI wasnât speaking of his mind . I meant his character. â
âWhose character?â her father muttered absently, having returned to his papers again.
â Stricklandâs ! Your son-in-lawâs!â she said in complete annoyance.
âOh, yes. Fine fellow. Already said so. Now here, in this next line, shall I say âcouncilâ or âconferenceâ? Council connotes a meeting of a body of men who meet regularlyâwouldnât you say?âwhile conference sounds like a more spontaneous assemblage. âConference,â therefore, seems closer to the facts, I think. Yes, âconferenceâ it shall be.â
Olivia frowned irritably at his bent head. She should have known better than to expect any help from him. Sir Octavius Matthews had a marvelous mind, but not for family matters. âBut you will come to see her off, wonât you, Papa?â she asked as she walked dolefully toward the door.
âEh? See whom off?â he murmured.
âOh, really , Papa! Clara ! Sheâs leaving right after breakfast.â
âWell, Olivia, Iâm at a crucial place just now.â He didnât look up from the page before him. âTell her goodbye for me. Love to the children ⦠good trip and all that.â And he waved her away.
She closed the study door behind her and sighed. Her father was a strange sort. He was not a bit gregariousâ living people didnât seem to interest him. Only dead Greeks engaged his mind. Even at dinner, the only time of day he joined the family, he scarcely ever engaged in conversation; his mind was still occupied with the books that had engaged him during the dayâthe Poetics , or Platoâs Republic or his favorite History of the Peloponnesian War . She was foolish to have expected to receive any assistance from him in dealing with real problems. If Thucydides hadnât recorded it, if Aristotle hadnât codified it, or if Plato hadnât ruminated on it, the problem had no reality for him.
She had to turn elsewhere for advice, but she was not sure where. The logical choice should be Charles. He was the most sensible, well-rounded member of the family, despite the fact that he