The Best American Mystery Stories 2014 Read Free Page A

Jetta with manual transmission, but a
Jetta
. I was not the woman for the job.”
    But perhaps my favorite assignment was “a box.” Brad Meltzer approached me with that one, and I said sure. I was getting cocky at that point. Riding high, due for a fall. All of a sudden the deadline was two weeks away and I still had no clue what I was going to write. To complicate matters, I was teaching at Eckerd College’s annual Writers in Paradise conference, which left me with virtually no free time.
    Then my friend and faculty colleague Ann Hood lost her sweater. You think I can carry a grudge? Ask her how she feels about the restaurant where she left her distinctive black cardigan. We called. We went back three times. Finally I asked to see the lost-and-found box for myself, convinced that the staff had overlooked the sweater. No, the black sweater was not there. But pawing through that sad collection of left-behinds, I remembered an assignment from my early days as a reporter in Waco, Texas, when I was asked to write an article about what was in the lost-and-found boxes at summer’s end. I had triumphed over the less-than-interesting findings by writing in what I imagined to be a very good imitation of Philip Marlowe’s voice. (God, I hope that piece never surfaces. RIP, my Waco clips.) But now I began to imagine a more sinister version of this story, one in which a young woman who imagines herself to be sophisticated, perhaps even a libertine, discovers that she’s a real piker when she comes up against a couple of good citizens from Waco, sometimes called the buckle on the Bible belt. In fact, I saw a distinctive buckle on a belt, emerging snakelike from a soft, sagging cardboard box, an item that could be linked to an unsolved murder—and the editor who assigned the story.
    I have two more short stories due right now—
right now
—and I just wish Ann Hood would lose another item of clothing.
    No discussion of writing short stories would be complete without a discussion of those who edit short stories. I’ve done it exactly once, for the Akashic Books noir series, and found it gratifying yet challenging. Sure, you want all the stories to be perfect upon arrival, but then you have to wonder if you’re even doing your job. As a short story writer, I yearn to believe they’re perfect when they leave my desk—but a little voice in the back of my head tells me when they’re not. Some of my best experiences have resulted from very good editing. Otto Penzler, for example, once told me that a story just wasn’t good enough and explained what he thought the weaknesses were. He gave me a chance to rework it; that story, “Hardly Knew Her,” was nominated for an Edgar and won the Anthony Award. Since the news of the selections for this collection went out into the world, I’ve heard from some editors who say they did nothing—nothing!—to the chosen stories. But I suspect that some outstanding editors are standing behind these stellar stories.
    So we circle back to why anyone writes short stories. One of the writers in this collection, Megan Abbott, told me that her students at Ole Miss, where she was the John and Renée Grisham writer in residence for 2013–2014, become starry-eyed over the occasional unicorn that wanders into the publishing forest—the writer who enjoys a big success with a collection of short stories. Most recently it was B. J. Novak, and George Saunders just before him, but such critically adored bestsellers are rare and almost unheard-of for those who specialize in the mystery story, such as the late Edward D. Hoch. I wonder again: Why does anyone write mystery short stories, with their exacting, exasperating demands?
    I can speak only for myself. The phone rings. Actually, my e-mail box pings. Actually, it makes no noise at all, because my computer is set to mute. I’ll try again: A blonde walks into my office. That’s true and it happens every day, thanks to Marko at Sally Hershberger Salon. I