Englefield. We are entitled to proceed on her written statement,â Madam Chair told me.
âSo you are prepared to decide a criminal matter on hearsay evidence?â
âItâs not a criminal matter yet, Mr Rumpole. And it wonât be unless your client breaks the order weâve been asked to make.â
âAnd plays football again?â
âExactly!â
âVery well. I take it that even if we have dispensed with the rule against hearsay evidence, I am still allowed to address the court?â
This request was apparently so unusual that Madam Chair had to seek advice from the clerk of the court, who stood up from his seat below her throne to whisper. This advice she passed on in a brief mutter to her bookends. Then she spoke.
âWe are prepared to hear you, Mr Rumpole, but make it brief.â
âI shall be brief. What is anti-social behaviour? If you ask me, I would say that the world has advanced towards civilization by reason of antisocial behaviour. The suffragettes behaved anti-socially and achieved the vote. Nelson Mandelaâs anti-social campaign brought justice to South Africa. Now this young person, this child I representâ¦â
I turned to wave a hand towards the long-haired twelve-year-old with curiously thoughtful brown eyes. âThis young Peter, or Pete, Timson.â
âWho is neither a suffragette nor Nelson Mandela,â Madam Chair thought it fit to remind me.
âThat is true,â I had to admit. âBut he is aninnocent child. He has no criminal record. He has broken no law. If football is illegal, it should be forbidden by an act of Parliament. Donât stain his blameless record by a verdict based on untested hearsay evidence.â
âIs that all, Mr Rumpole?â Madam Chair broke into my final dramatic pause.
âAll,â I said. âAnd more than enough, in my submission, to let this child go back to playing.â With this I sat down, in the vain hope that I might have touched, somewhere in Madam Chair, a motherâs heart.
After further whispered conversations the Chair spoke. âMr Rumpoleâs speeches,â she said, âmay be thought amusing in the Central Criminal Court, but here we cannot let his so-called oratory distract us from our clear duty. Peter Timson.â Here, prompted by an usher, my client rose to his diminutive height. âWe make an order forbidding you to enter Beechwood Grove for any purpose whatsoever, including, of course, the playing of football.â
When I went to say goodbye to my client, he was standing next to his father, Bertie.
âSay thank you to Mr Rumpole. I suppose he did his best.â
âThank you, Mr Rumpole.â Peter seemed extraordinarily pleased with the result. âI got an ASBO! All them down Rampton Road are going to be
so
jealous.â
I had never, in all my legal life, met so delighted a loser.
Back in Chambers I poured out the last glass from a bottle of Château Thames Embankment and lit a small cigar. My spirits were at a low ebb. My practice seemed to have shrunk to Pete-sized proportions. Then, quite unexpectedly, the tide turned. The telephone rang and I picked it up to hear once again the voice of my favourite solicitor.
âIâm sorry about the ASBO case,â Bonny Bernard said. âBut I think I might soon be in a position to offer you a murder.â
4
The case Bonny Bernard had sent me seemed in the best tradition of English murders since the faroff days of Jack the Ripper and the Camden Town affair. The tragedy of the unfortunate girls who go on the game is that they all too easily fall victim to manual strangulation.
The difference between these classic cases and the brief I was eagerly noting was that, in my present case, a death in Flyte Street, a small turning off Sussex Gardens near to Paddington Station, the alleged culprit was arrested in the dead girlâsroom and there seemed to be no mystery about