the word holds a profound significance for her never wavers. She accepts the other names she is given only as a matter of necessity or as a function of familiarity, as when she answers to âMaggieâ at school, to âRosalieâ at Oliverâs restaurant, or to Belâs affectionate diminutive, âkid.â For years, she is condemned to spell rather than pronounce her own name, a limitation symbolic of the lack of information she, as victim of a kidnapping, has about herself and her personal history. Psycheâs gradual understanding of the nameâs pronunciation and implications seems, at first glance, to emphasize the way in which the self develops over time and is shaped by experience, rather than springing into existence fully formed. Such a privileging of process is consistent with Brettâs own emphasis on the importance of taking into account âgrowth and developmentâ in order to understand the âreal activity of the mind.â 18 However the novel itself emphasizes that Psyche both believes in and illustrates the way an individualâs personality can remain intact despite the vagaries of circumstance.
Psyche also
fails to conform to stereotypes of the late 1950s in its direct focus on sexuality. The 1953 publication of
Sexual Behavior in the Human Femaleby
Alfred Kinsey et al focused public attention on the female libido, claiming that women were not different from men in seeking sexual satisfaction. Psycheâs natural and magnetic appeal to both men and women reinforces and underscores the link to Kinseyâs findings. Are there suggestions of lesbian sexuality in the sympathetic portrayal of Kathie, with her elite private school background and experiences of âan incessant warfare between mind and bodyâ 19 and âstrife that had torn her apart since adolescence,â 20 who seems to have an unrequited love for Bel and perhaps for Psyche as well?
While the question of what shapes a person is a key theme, the novelâs plot revolves around a kidnapping. Modern kidnapping in North America is often considered to begin with the 1874 abduction of four-year-old Charley Ross. The mystery of Rossâs disappearance was never solved and for the next fifty years men came forward claiming to be the âlost boy.â Lost boys were not uncommon in the late nineteenth century, in both real life and in fiction. The most famous fictional Lost Boys were probably those in J. M. Barrieâs
Peter Pan
. Historian Paula Fass describes âlost and foundâ newspaper ads for children and reports that tens of thousands of American children disappeared in late-nineteenth-century cities, taken into institutions, abandoned, murdered, or abducted. 21 The grieving parents of lost children worried not only about a childâs survival or safety and the abuse of innocence but also about how his or her identity would be altered by the experience. This concern for the effect on a childâs character can be seen in texts ranging from colonial âcaptivity narrativesâ to those describing the 1974 kidnapping of Patty Hearst. It is very different from Psycheâs motherâs hope, indeed the belief she clings to despite reading opinions to the contrary, âthat her child could have shaped her environment to her own inherent needs, rather than allowing her environment to be the principal factor in determining the kind of person she would be.â 22
The idea of the âlost boyâ was gradually replaced by the fear that children were vulnerable to harm not only from strangers and misfits but also from elite, successful, educated young men. Fass argues that by the 1920s kidnapping was the âideal criminal form,â with the best example of this the 1924 high-profile kidnapping/murder of Bobby Franks by college students Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb. 23 The senselessness and brutality of the abduction and murder both shocked and fascinated