care to look more closely into the history of libraries, who could have collected all these books so methodically? Not country bumpkins like you, let me tell you. You donât work on a farm, do you? Sorry, thought you did. But anyway, I donât need to see your tax return to see that unlike those kings and monks andnobles, people with power, in short, you wouldnât have been able to collect thousands of books. Take Cardinal Mazarin for instance, seventeenth century: he had forty thousand books in his personal library in Paris. Nice little collection. And one day, he decided to open it to the public. That was pretty good going, for a cardinal. Still, we shouldnât be fooled: what mattered most to him was the prestige it brought him. The building got to be called âthe Mazarineâ. He was as proud as punch, our cardinal. Well, after all, books are like carriages, the whole point is to show off. True culture for rich people doesnât come till later, it creeps up on them, and itâs not well regarded. In his case, it took the shape of an admirable man called Gabriel Naudé. A talented little commoner, who started off wanting to be a doctor, but he fell in love with the cardinalâs books, so he became his head librarian. When the weather was overcast, you couldnât see a thing inside the poky Mazarine, it was worse than here. But they had an excuse, it was early days. Impressive early days. Gabriel Naudé there and then defined a dozen categories: theology, philosophy, history and so on, andabout thirty sub-categories.
Pre-Melvil Dewey!
Which proves the Americans didnât invent anything. Well, isnât an American a European who missed the boat home? I donât go anywhere nowadays, myself. Oh, letâs not even mention boats, Iâll get a hot flush. Aeroplanes? Are you kidding? Never! No, I donât go anywhere these days. I ask you, whatâs the point? You never have enough time to understand what youâre seeing, and I canât stand only half knowing things. Trying to visit an art gallery in a couple of hours is stupid. Two hours, thatâs hardly enough for me to take in a single painting. No, Iâm not exaggerating. Oh, well, perhaps you, when you look at a picture, youâre just happy to let your feelings respond to colours arranged in a certain order. That kind of romantic swooning isnât my cup of tea. No, no. I have to have all the possible information, about even the tiniest picture. Thatâs the way I am, I have to know everything; the painterâs biography, where his studio was, what were the technical conditions, who commissioned the painting, the political context, the aesthetic quarrels of the day, how the paints were chemically composed âeverything. No, I canât stand having just a smattering of superficial knowledge. So tourism, no, out of the question. I used to go to Italy, time was. Now I just read the books in the Fine Arts section. I learn more and it costs me less. Iâm sure Martin would agree with me about that. A perfectionist, a workaholic, an obsessive. In fact he must be writing a thesis or something. I told myself that, when I finally peeped discreetly over his shoulder and managed to read: âPeasant revolts in the Poitiers region in the reign of Louis XVâ. Written on the outside of a big blue folder. I assumed that was the subject of his thesis.
Peasant revolts in the Poitiers region in the reign of Louis XV
. Iâd have preferred it if heâd been working on the reign of Louis XVI or the Revolution. Because Louis XV â kind of a nothing reign. Louis XIV or Louis XVI, yes, no problem, but Louis XV is just a black hole. Look under 944.655, and youâll see, we donât have anything. Whereas in 944.75, history of the French Revolution, thereâs much more. My favourite shelfmark. And there are nine sub-divisions in it. You really canât imagine. For instance, 944.755 is the