it, and so on. Solving a Rubikâs cube requires fluid intelligence, as does working out why your partner isnât talking to you when you have no memory of doing anything wrong. In each case, the information you have is new and you have to work out what to do with it in order to arrive at an outcome that benefits you.
Crystallized intelligence is the information you have stored in memory and can utilize to help you get the better of situations. Knowing the lead actor in an obscure 1950s film for a trivia game requires crystallized intelligence. Knowing all the capital cities of the northern hemisphere is crystallized intelligence. Learning a second (or third or fourth) language utilizes crystallized intelligence. Crystallized intelligence is the knowledge you have accumulated, where fluid intelligence is how well you can use it or deal with unfamiliar things that need working out.
Itâs fair to say that fluid intelligence is another variation of g and working memory; the manipulation and processing of information. But crystallized intelligence is increasingly viewed as a separate system, and the workings of the brain back this up. One quite telling fact is that fluid intelligence declines as we age; someone aged eighty will perform worse on a fluid intelligence test than he or she did aged thirty, orfifty. Neuroanatomical studies (and numerous autopsies) revealed the prefrontal cortex, believed responsible for fluid intelligence, atrophies more with age than most other brain regions.
Contrastingly, crystallized intelligence remains stable over a lifetime. Someone who learns French at eighteen will still be able to speak it at eighty-five, unless they stopped using it and forgot it at nineteen. Crystallized intelligence is supported by long-term memories, which are distributed widely throughout the brain and tend to be resilient enough to withstand the ravages of time. The prefrontal cortex is a demanding energetic region that needs to engage in constant active processing to support fluid intelligence, actions that are quite dynamic and thus more likely to result in gradual wear and tear (intense neuronal activity tends to give off a lot of waste products such as free radicals, energetic particles that are harmful to cells).
Both types of intelligence are interdependent; thereâs no point in being able to manipulate information if you canât access any of it, and vice versa. Itâs tricky to separate them clearly for study. Luckily, intelligence tests can be designed to focus mostly on either fluid or crystallized intelligence. Tests that require individuals to analyze unfamiliar patterns and identify odd ones out or work out how they are interconnected are thought to assess fluid intelligence; all the information is novel and needs to be processed, so crystallized-intelligence use is minimal. Similarly, tests of recall and knowledge such as word-list memory, or the aforementioned trivia games, focus on crystallized intelligence.
Itâs never quite that simple of course. Tasks where you have to sort unfamiliar patterns still rely on an awareness of images,colors, even the means by which you complete the test ( if itâs rearranging a series of cards, youâll be using your knowledge of what cards are and how to arrange them). This is another thing that makes brain-scanning studies tricky; even doing a simple task involves multiple brain regions. But, in general, tasks for fluid intelligence tend to show greater activity in the prefrontal cortex and associated regions, and crystallized- intelligence tasks suggest a role of the wider cortex, often the parietal-lobe (the upper-middle bit of the brain) regions, such as the supramarginal gyrus and Brocaâs area. The former is often thought of as being necessary for storage and processing of information concerning emotion and some sensory data, while the latter is a key part of our language-processing system. Both are interconnected, and suggest