so deep that it pushed me into half a commitment.
âHereâs where we stand, Hector, so you know. I donât buy that drug theory. That said, Iâll go this far with you. Iâll do the investigation and the pretrial work. Iâm doing this partly for Danny anyway. If I find youâre clean, Iâll go all the way with you.â
He bounced up like a spring toy with his hand out to seal the deal. I stayed where I was.
âUnderstand the other half. If I find you had a hand in Dannyâs death, even remotely, youâll be looking for another attorney. Do we understand each other?â
âWe do.â
The hand was still out there. On those terms, I shook it.
CHAPTER THREE
The lines on Mr. Devlinâs Mount Rushmore features deepened the further I got into explaining the circumstances of our new maybe-client. A day of combat in the criminal session of the Suffolk Superior Court left him more depleted of energy than I liked to see. I knew it was not the best moment to broach a subject that left even me with second, third, and fourth thoughts, but the timing couldnât be helped.
âYouâve thought about this, Michael.â
It was a question.
âNot for anyâNo. There was no time. Thatâs why I left the escape hatch open. If our investigation shows that heâs guilty, we withdraw.â
He leaned back, folded his arms, and gave me that look.
âYou have trouble with that, Mr. D.?â
âIâm sitting here praying to God that my junior partner has an equal amount of trouble with it.â
The eyebrows went up, and he waited.
âI know. Youâve always told me that you canât base a defense on the belief that your client is innocent.â
âAnd the reason?â
Iâd often thought he was a frustrated law professor.
âThey lie. Then you find yourself up the creek and paddling backward, to quote your words. Iâm still not totally convinced of that theory.â
An argument always brought him up with his elbows on the desk.
âThen letâs play it your way, Michael. What possible evidence, other than his word, do you have of this jockeyâs innocence?â
âThatâs why I left the escape hatch.â
That had him up and pacing.
âLet me set the scene. We take this case on. Judge whoever-it-is sets a trial date, which rapidly approaches. You turn up something down the road that suggests perhaps that our client is not altogether innocent. You make a motion to withdraw from the case.â
âI see where this is going.â
âIâm just getting warmed up. The judge asks, âOn what grounds, Mr. Knight?â You say, âI want out because my client is guilty.â Ninety percent of the defendants the judge tries are guilty. The judge says, âIf I let lawyers out on those grounds, this court would look like musical chairs. Denied.ââ
âThatâs not exactlyââ
âOh, thatâs right. Thereâs another ground. âYour Honor, the victim was my good friend.â âOh,â says the judge. âThatâs different. Iâll disrupt my trial schedule. Weâll put off giving this defendant a speedy trial under the constitution while another lawyer gets up to speed. We wouldnât want you to have conflicted feelings, Mr. Knight.ââ
His pacing had brought him next to me. I felt his hand on my shoulder. He said one word that carried with it a paragraph.
âMichael.â
âDoesnât play, does it?â
âNot in this lifetime. You have my sympathy, but youâve got to fish or cut bait. Weâre in or weâre out. You make the call. Either way, Iâm with you. But thereâs no halfway.â
I knew he was right before he even started. On the other hand, Hector Vasquez didnât. And yet he accepted my representation with a trapdoor that would throw his case into turmoil if it were ever sprung.